The Emoticon Generation

The Emoticon Generation
Guy Hasson

My turn has finally come around in The Emoticon Generation Blog Tour. I highly recommend reading the other posts in this series, both for the varied perspectives other reviewers bring to the book, and because I’m going to skip over many of the basics in this post. Others have been kind enough to summarize the stories, talk a little about the author, and trade comments about who liked what, so I’m going to jump right into the bits that interest me the most and poke around those topics for awhile.

The stories in this collection are unified by the near future theme. In some cases, they are only tangentially science fiction, for two reasons. First, the stories are always character focused. This is not Analog-style Hard SF, where competent white men solve engineering problems, it is SF where some science fictional idea kicks off a story that is almost entirely about the people involved. “Science” generally takes a back seat to “fiction.” Second, whatever concept lies at the root of the story feels as though it could be hitting the real world science news tomorrow. Or yesterday. In fact, Hasson is convincing enough in some of the stories that I would not be surprised to find out that some government somewhere is actually using the technology he describes. I know I’m not alone in thinking that “Ping!” might be a real word; I felt obligated to confirm that the entirety of the first story, “Generation E,” is in fact made up. I wasn’t sure.

Four of the seven stories take on one particular cutting edge endeavor that sits at the center of a large portion of SF discourse: digitizing people. Plenty of books take downloaded personalities as a given; it’s not a new idea, though I get the feeling that it has grown more ubiquitous in recent years. Some authors use their books as proxies arguing one aspect or another of the issue (Karl Schroeder, for example, or Greg Egan), while others, like noted internet puppy Charlie Stross, advocate in real life. Hasson doesn’t take a side in the debate, instead choosing to examine the researchers, early adopters, and guinea pigs that would make such a thing possible. He seems much less interested in the hows of the thing, or the effect it would have on us some hundreds of years down the line. Instead, Hasson teases out the ethical questions that will face us tomorrow, or next year, or next decade, if it turns out we can scan our brains into computers.

Two of the stories, “Hatchling” and “Eternity Wasted,” deal specifically with, shall we say, digital personhood. If these AIs are sentient, be they created or copied, what rights do they have? Is it torture if the intelligence is just sitting in a computer somewhere? Is it murder to turn them off? Can we put these personalities to use for science? Considering the pitched battles being waged (in the US at least) over the rights of corporations and fetuses, where will people draw the line with AI? I can’t help but wonder if Kansas-based churches will picket and protest when digital people are being used as experimental subjects, or if they will just mutter about “‘dem newfangled eee-lectronics” and go about their business. What about the tech people that rise to the defense of digital rights and persecuted hackers? How will they feel about the mathematician locked away in his integrated circuit cell? Hasson has no answers, nor does he even directly ask the questions. One can sense his unease with the uses he seems to expect us to put these AIs to, however. I wonder if he read Tony Daniels’ Metaplanetary while writing? (Daniels has AIs stand in for Jews in his WWII-in-space epic.)

Two more, “All of Me” and “Her Destiny” play with even more prosaic questions. The first is pretty amusing in its way, wondering what might happen when someone’s digital copy is better than the real thing. I probably shouldn’t have been laughing at this story, but I was. (Sign of distasteful personality traits in the reviewer?) The second is a bit more fantastic, using digitized consciousness to play with ideas about fate and destiny. It walks a fine line between heartstring-tugging and mind-bending. Neither of these dig into the thorny ethical issues of uploaded intelligence, instead playing with what if questions that drift more into thought provoking entertainment.

The remaining stories maintain the similar balance of sympathetic characters and Keanu Reeves-esque “Woah” inducing concepts, but without the thematic unity of the above four. “Freedom is Only a Step Away” kept me thinking, all the moreso because I have been involved in teaching and am currently worried about my own children’s education. Hasson makes implications about the way our current society shackles us and cuts us off from our full potential, but hedges away from the anarchic premise of the story. I suspect he’s enjoying tweaking everyone, without actually making policy recommendations. “Generation E” is easily the most fun of the stories, again no doubt because my oldest child is just discovering email. As a fellow blogger said during our conversation about this, “You say your daughter is just writing gibberish, but do you really know??” Hmmm.

So these are my reactions to the stories. The book is fairly short, but there is lots to chew on. Hasson has said in other interviews that his number one goal is to blow people’s minds; I’d say he succeeds this time. Now I’m just waiting for one or another science blog to break the news that half of Hasson’s inventions are actually being put to use by Sony, the Russian government, or a start-up in Silicon Valley.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “The Emoticon Generation

  1. You’re spot on and it’s exactly what I was thinking reading most of these stories – surely this is already real? I also like the school/education system story – the ending did actually make me laugh POSSIBLE SPOILER – just made me think of Animal Farm in that things had really gone full circle.
    I think we probably enjoyed similar stories and maybe that’s a good demonstration of how we all seemed to relate to different stories from the collection.
    All of Me was amusing – of course the female was manipulating the computer and I suppose not keeping the formulas for any version of the real guy where she didn’t like his answers but she was totally addicted wasn’t she?
    Yes, with the two AI stories – is it mean to treat them like this – is it murder? The Positronic Man is a good example of where AI develops and develops until the AI itself wants to become human and wants rights. The AI in that story starts wearing clothes and even going to the pretense of eating – of course he could never really change completely because he’s never going to actually be human is he. But, even though they’re not human I did feel sorry for the AIs in this story a million years in isolation – that’s just unthinkable.
    Lynn 😀

    • I think of all the reviews I read of the book, I agreed with yours the most. I have no idea if we’ll agree on anything else, but on this book at least, we’re in the same place. I need to read more of your blog to find out.
      The more I think about All of Me, the worse everyone looks. The woman is manipulative and unsatisfiable, but the man is losing out to a simulation of himself. I wonder what will really happen if we manage to upload or create people. Pandemonium, I guess.

      • Re All of Me – I don’t know what the woman was thinking and she certainly was manipulative. When you look at her actions straight away she was acting suspiciously, letting herself into the guy’s house to get to his computer – it was his simulation afterall – a gift! Imagine if you could upload this into a robot – now it just got freaky (or has that already been done with Stepford Wives)!
        Lynn 😀

  2. Thanks for taking a different look at this collection, more of a “on a whole” look, rather than a piece by piece look. This is my favorite kind of science fiction, the kind that’s a little too close to home, that could be on CNN tomorrow as a technological breakthrough. I’m always fascinated by AI stories, especially those from the AI’s point of view. do they have rights? are they a person? are they free to make their own decisions? just like you said, is it murder if we turn them off (or would it be more like weeding the garden?)? Hasson writes some damn though provoking fiction, that is for sure.

    • I’m not sure you realized that I prefer rambling, off the beaten path write-ups and scheduled accordingly, or if this was just a happy coincidence. The fun for me in all of this is seeing the meta-dialogue that the books carry on with each other (too much Coode Street?). Hasson manages to come at this from a skewed angle that few others do, which makes the book so much fun. I’d love to get him talking about this.

  3. Pingback: Two Dudes in an Attic Reviews ‘The Emoticon Generation’ | Guy Hasson's Imagination
  4. I think I enjoyed the stories dealing with AI personhood the most. And yes, your comment about just waiting to hear if or when Russia or some other world power makes some of these stories real mirrors my reaction to some of the cutting edge stories.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s